056 partially handled interpreted flow

// ═══ RULED 2026-08-07 (Lars). This test is now red against a DECIDED target. ═══
//
// "Why don't we make something like `unhandled-branch`? We add leniency as a
// mode, and add a branch like that which sends out the references too, living
// on the resource bridge?"
//
// THE RULING:
//   1. `run` gains a branch — `| unhandled-branch { branch, payload, handles }`.
//      An interpreted fragment that does not handle an outcome hands it back
//      rather than erroring. Distinct from `| result`, because "finished with
//      this value" and "stopped, nobody handled this" are different events and
//      a host wants to tell them apart.
//   2. Leniency is a MODE on `run`, not the interpreter's nature. `run` already
//      takes fail_fast / shape / budget / auto_discharge; totality is one more.
//      Policy (which API key gets which mode) is resolved by the CALLER — the
//      interpreter never sees a key.
//   3. Strict mode REFUSES PRE-FLIGHT, shape-checking the incoming source for
//      full handling before anything executes. Today's failure is worse than
//      either option: NoBranchMatch fires after the event already ran.
//   4. The payload carries NAMED handles, not the count `run` returns today, so
//      the next line of a shell can address what the last one parked on the
//      bridge.
//
// WHY THIS IS PRINCIPLED AND NOT MERELY LENIENT: the host MUST handle
// `| unhandled-branch` — KORU022 makes it. Totality is not abandoned, it is
// RELOCATED to the boundary where a compiler still exists. The fragment may be
// partial; the program receiving partiality may not be.
//
// WHO THE OUTER HANDLER IS, which is what the mode selects:
//   a human at a prompt   — the shell prints it; that IS the handling
//   a model over a bridge — it is fed back as a message and teaches the model
//   a test harness        — an unhandled branch is a test FAILURE (Lars, on 395_002)
//   nobody (compiled)     — strict; refuse pre-flight
//
// C (the empty branch name when an arm fires) needed no ruling and is a plain
// defect: a terminal void event overwrites the flow's real branch with "".
//
// STILL RED, and correctly: `| unhandled-branch` does not exist yet. expected.txt
// asserts today's measured A/B/C so the file documents the gap honestly; it is
// rewritten to the ruled shape by whoever implements it.
// What does the interpreter do when interpreted source handles only SOME of an
// event's branches, and the unhandled one is taken?
//
// In compiled Koru that is KORU022 at compile time. Interpreted source arrives
// after every compile step is over, so the same rule has nowhere to fire.
~import std/runtime
~import std/io

const std = @import("std");

// Two branches, and which one fires is a runtime decision.
~pub tor pick { n: i64 }
| ok i64
| bad string

~proc pick|zig {
    if (n > 0) return .{ .ok = n };
    return .{ .bad = "n was not positive" };
}

~pub tor note { text: string }

~proc note|zig {
    std.debug.print("      note: {s}\n", .{text});
}

~std/runtime:register(scope: "api") {
    pick(1)
    note(1)
}

// A: no continuations at all. The event's outcome has nowhere to go.
const A = "pick(n: -1)";

// B: only `| ok` is handled, and `| bad` is the branch that fires. THE QUESTION.
const B = "pick(n: -1)\n| ok v |> note(text: \"took ok\")";

// C: control — same source, and the handled branch is the one that fires.
const C = "pick(n: 5)\n| ok v |> note(text: \"took ok\")";

~std/io:print.ln("--- A: no arms, unhandled outcome")
~std/runtime:run(source: A, scope: "api")
| result r |> std/io:print.ln("  result branch=[{{ r.value.branch:s }}]")
| exhausted _ |> std/io:print.ln("  EXHAUSTED")
| parse-error e |> std/io:print.ln("  PARSE ERROR: {{ e.message:s }}")
| validation-error v |> std/io:print.ln("  VALIDATION ERROR: {{ v:s }}")
| shape-error s |> std/io:print.ln("  SHAPE ERROR: {{ s.message:s }}")
| event-denied ev |> std/io:print.ln("  EVENT DENIED: {{ ev:s }}")
| dispatch-error d |> std/io:print.ln("  DISPATCH ERROR: {{ d.message:s }}")
| scope-not-found _ |> std/io:print.ln("  SCOPE NOT FOUND")

~std/io:print.ln("--- B: only | ok handled, | bad fires")
~std/runtime:run(source: B, scope: "api")
| result r |> std/io:print.ln("  result branch=[{{ r.value.branch:s }}]")
| exhausted _ |> std/io:print.ln("  EXHAUSTED")
| parse-error e |> std/io:print.ln("  PARSE ERROR: {{ e.message:s }}")
| validation-error v |> std/io:print.ln("  VALIDATION ERROR: {{ v:s }}")
| shape-error s |> std/io:print.ln("  SHAPE ERROR: {{ s.message:s }}")
| event-denied ev |> std/io:print.ln("  EVENT DENIED: {{ ev:s }}")
| dispatch-error d |> std/io:print.ln("  DISPATCH ERROR: {{ d.message:s }}")
| scope-not-found _ |> std/io:print.ln("  SCOPE NOT FOUND")

~std/io:print.ln("--- C: control, | ok handled and | ok fires")
~std/runtime:run(source: C, scope: "api")
| result r |> std/io:print.ln("  result branch=[{{ r.value.branch:s }}]")
| exhausted _ |> std/io:print.ln("  EXHAUSTED")
| parse-error e |> std/io:print.ln("  PARSE ERROR: {{ e.message:s }}")
| validation-error v |> std/io:print.ln("  VALIDATION ERROR: {{ v:s }}")
| shape-error s |> std/io:print.ln("  SHAPE ERROR: {{ s.message:s }}")
| event-denied ev |> std/io:print.ln("  EVENT DENIED: {{ ev:s }}")
| dispatch-error d |> std/io:print.ln("  DISPATCH ERROR: {{ d.message:s }}")
| scope-not-found _ |> std/io:print.ln("  SCOPE NOT FOUND")